GSCOP - The New Buzzword
with a Sting for the Underprepared
How the GSCOP impacts non-food categories
By
Brian Moore, Global
Retail Consultant and CEO
of
EMR-NAMNEWS
Strictly
speaking, the new Groceries Supply Code Of Practice (GSCOP),
which came into being on the 4th February 2010, deals
with grocery products sold through grocery retailers
with turnover of more than £1bn per annum. In practice,
it is a template for all supplies of all categories via
all retailers, and has significant implications for
those outside mainline grocery channels.
It should also
be borne in mind that the new legislation is aimed at
protecting the consumer from overcharging, and is not
intended as a means of protecting suppliers or retailers
in their day-to-day dealings with third parties. It is
therefore important that non-food suppliers and
retailers use the new code as an opportunity to
re-engineer their supplier-retailer trading partnership
to optimise joint-profitability, as a basis encouraging
repeat visits by satisfied shoppers.
Whilst some
suppliers will soon become involved in the GSCOP process
via their direct relationships with the major grocery
retailers, non-food suppliers and retailers have an
opportunity to incorporate key elements of the code of
practice in anticipation of their appearance on the
radar…
The full GSCOP
document can be found on the
Competition Commission
website, and we have selected the
following parts dealing with Prices & Payments,
Promotions and Other Duties in order to identify
possible applications in non-food retailing as a general
guideline for readers. It is obviously crucial for
businesses to seek legal advice on the full GSCOP
document before taking any action.
Essentially,
the GSCOP offers an opportunity for suppliers and
retailers to re-assess their entire working
relationships and trade partnerships, building a basis
for fair share negotiation in the process. As an
indicator of how far it goes, the new code brings in
changes relating to supplier prices and payments,
promotions, compensation for forecasting errors,
supplier-retailer contracts, personal management of the
seller-buyer process, and significant increases in
record-keeping.
Prices and Payments:
A retailer
must pay a supplier for products delivered to that
retailer’s specification in accordance with the relevant
Supply Agreement or supplier-retailer contract, and, in
any case, within a reasonable time after the date of the
supplier’s invoice. In other words, a retailer has to
pay within the agreed credit period, and can no longer
rely upon flexible extended credit as a source of ‘free’
funding. Moreover, the supplier does not have to pay
for shrinkage arising from damage or products stolen
from the retailer’s premises.
In addition,
the supplier is under no obligation to contribute to
marketing costs such as artwork or packaging design,
consumer or market research, the opening or refurbishing
of a store, or hospitality for that retailer’s staff.
Promotions:
A retailer
must not directly or indirectly require a supplier to
make any payment in order to secure better positioning
or an increase in the allocation of shelf space for any
products of that supplier within a store unless such
payment is made in relation to a promotion.
Moreover, a
retailer must not, directly or indirectly, require a
supplier predominantly to fund the costs of a promotion.
In other words, suppliers and retailers will need to be
more specific about promotional timing, terms and
conditions, and keep appropriate records.
Compensation for Forecasting Errors:
Given that the
government believes that over-ordering can lead to
wastage and retail price rises, a retailer must take all
due care to ensure that when ordering products from a
supplier at a promotional wholesale price, not to
over-order. Also if that retailer fails to take such
steps it must compensate that supplier for any products
over-ordered and which it subsequently sells at a higher
non-promotional retail price. Incidentally, this could
spell the end of sale-or-return in many categories such
as home entertainment, magazine, and newspaper
retailing.
Supplier-Retailer Contracts:
Despite, or
because of being the home of world class leading-edge
retailers, the UK has lagged behind other countries in
formalising supplier-retailer partnerships via legally
binding supply contracts. The new code seeks to remedy
that omission via the new Supply Agreement. In
practice, this will be a detailed contractual record of
agreement reached between the parties, enforceable in
law. Again, it might be preferable for non-food
suppliers to evolve such agreements with retailers by
negotiation, in advance of the legislation.
Overall, the
GSCOP represents a long overdue breakthrough in
supplier-retailer relationships. Although focused
initially on grocery supply, it is inevitable that the
Code will eventually apply to all channels and
categories. However, significant opportunities are
available for those supplier-retailer partners that are
willing to incorporate the key elements of the code into
their trading agreements, to their mutual benefit.
Alternatively,
why not await the imposition of a Government version of
a non-food Code-of-Practice, and hope for the best?
KamTip:
GSCOP as an opportunity to re-engineer the non-food
supplier-retailer relationship…see
Namnews March
2010
Date article published: March 2010
