Private Equity Independency?
By
Brian Moore, Global
Retail Consultant and CEO
of
EMR-NAMNEWS
Despite the fact
that City opinion indicates that the private equity boom is ‘somewhere near its
top’, it is likely that the effect of such takeovers of retailers will continue
to impact supplier-customer relationships over the next five years.
Essentially,
private equity firms derive value from inefficient firms by restructuring the
organisation, selling off assets, reorganising cashflows. Or, they add value to
fast growing firms by providing them with cashflow, and then re-float at a
higher valuation. In other words, the business is primarily driven by financial
KPIs to ensure a high valuation when re-floated. In the process, they become
more challenging competitors for non private equity retailers.
Whilst private
equity funded customers will obviously require fundamental changes in trade
strategy, those retailers traditionally funded by the stockmarket will need to
incorporate similar financial KPIs in order to preserve their independence. This
means that suppliers will also need to change their approach to traditionally
funded customers in order to optimise trade investment and partnerships. In
practice, this means that a traditional customer will also want to maximise its
return on capital. Realistically this means achieving an average ROCE of 15%,
net margins of 5%, stock rotation of 20+ per annum and sales per sq.ft. of
£1,000+ per annum. It will buy on an average gross margin of 25%, with an
average GMROII of 500%.
A major benefit
for suppliers will be that a stockmarket funded company will continue to operate
in very transparent conditions, in that the results will be readily available in
its annual and interim accounts. This means that by gaining experience in
helping the traditional customer to achieve its financial KPIs, the resulting
skills will help in managing private equity customers, albeit operating in more
opaque circumstances. Given these fundamental changes in the market, suppliers
will need to revisit the partnership criteria used in determining whether to
invest, maintain or divest of each of their traditional customers. In terms of
potential market share, the customer will have to operate in a more competitive
environment, short-term, thereby changing its life-cycle stage and thus require
re-balancing of a supplier’s customer portfolio.
Whilst the
customer’s corporate culture is unlikely to change fundamentally in the
short-term, it is likely that the increased focus upon financial performance
will require the supplier to reassess strategic alignment in terms of new
definitions of short, medium and long-term investment for both parties.
Consumer-shopper match will also change because of new competitive pressures,
requiring re-allocation of trade funding in order to compensate for shopper
switching amongst the customer base. In terms of investment appeal, traditional
customers will adopt the private equity approach of favouring investments that
show an immediate impact on the bottom line, thereby ruling out investments
promising deferred rewards. However, in return for delivering immediate bottom
line improvement, the supplier will be in a better position to negotiate a high
degree of customer compliance.
Finally, because
of these fundamental shifts in trade partnership measures, it is likely that the
supplier’s relative appeal to the customer will change, when compared with other
suppliers. This means that the whole customer portfolio, a mixture of private
equity and traditionally funded retailers, will have to be rebalanced in
relation to the supplier’s objectives and growth expectations. Given this highly
transparent level of financial interdependence, and operating, out of necessity,
at the financial limits, it is crucial that the supplier base this reassessment
of the trade partnership upon a robust customer profitability analysis system.
Otherwise a supplier’s risk-seeking profile evolves into recklessness…with only
one loser.
Incidentally,
should a traditionally funded retailer ignore the new need for financial KPIs,
then such apathy can increase the possibility of their becoming part of the
private equity lunch-menu….
For KamTips on
'Traditionally Funded Customer as a Financial Partner' see
Namnews – July 2007

Date
article published: 07/2007