Certain Basics in Uncertain Times...
By
Brian Moore, Global
Retail Consultant and CEO
of
EMR-NAMNEWS
A general
response to the global financial crisis has been
confusion at most levels. This will be followed by fear
in the New Year, as it becomes evident that the
knee-jerk reactive moves by the system have failed to
produce adequate results… Those in doubt should refer to
the Begbies Traynor ‘critical watch-list’, containing
323 retailers having a 70% plus chance of going bust in
the New Year, probably accelerating the structural shift
from town centres to the giant malls in the process.
Onerous
inflation-linked retail rental terms, with upward-only
rent reviews are hangovers from the past, and will cause
properties to revert to landlords as retailers go bust.
Landlords will then have to cut rents to levels that
represent value-for-money for prospective tenants. In
fact, demonstrable value for money will become a key
certainty in all aspects of the supplier-retailer
relationship, with fair-share of risk and reward a given
component of all trade partnerships. In other words, all
the chips are now down...
Given the
rapid rate of change, it is tempting, but risky, to
await a return to ‘normal’ before resuming a strategic
approach to managing major customers. Better to focus
upon what is certain, while others await the arrival of
a new business model in order to redefine what remains
of their future. However, success in business is about
finding ways around negative turns in a market. It is by
no means all ‘doom and gloom’. Neither is it about
‘business as usual’. In fact, it could be said that the
past 15-20 years have been very unusual...
Some
suppliers have responded to the financial chaos by
keeping busy doing what seemed to work in the past.
Others have simply cut costs, everywhere. However,
pro-active suppliers recognise that significant
opportunities always exist amidst confusion, especially
when others are facing the other way, caught in the
headlights. In fact, pragmatic NAMs & KAMs are finding a
way forward by isolating and reverting to the few
certainties that remain in uncertain times, the business
basics, the most important of which is the relationship
between risk and reward.
With the UK
Bank Rate heading towards 1%, and eventually 0%, perhaps
by January/February ‘09, it could seem that Return on
Capital Employed, the universal KPI, should follow
downwards. In other words, because ROCE measures the
relationship between risk and reward in business, the
ultimate benchmark was traditionally the interest rate
for safe deposits. In practice, this meant that when 5%
was available on safe deposit, an ROCE rate of 12-15%
was a reasonable return on money placed at risk in a
business. This level of performance drove the share
price upwards, ensuring autonomy and independence, lower
costs of credit from banks, and the active support of
suppliers...
Given that
the UK banks were bailed out by the Government with
loans costing an unrealistic 12% ‘interest’, in contrast
with Germany, France and the US at approximately 7%, the
‘real’ rate for money on deposit is probably 5-8%,
despite the 1% currently available. Thus, a reasonable
rate of ROCE for business remains at 12-15%, minimum.
This level of ROCE performance thus becomes a crucial
and primary measure of a customer’s suitability as a
trade partner. The first move therefore has to be to
ensure that ‘invest’ trade partners are currently
achieving acceptable levels of ROCE, i.e. 12-15%. This
means that if a supplier decides to invest in a trade
partner of lower ROCE, there has to be a real
possibility of raising that performance to over 10%,
fast enough to justify the additional risk involved...
Next, the
suppliers have to ensure that their own businesses
operate at 12-15% ROCE, in order to ensure that they
maintain their freedom to invest in key customers,
safely. This provides a basis for developing a mutually
productive trade partnership for both parties that
reflects the current real-world economic environment.
Essentially,
what has changed radically for trade partners is demand
for value-for-money at each stage in the supply chain,
all the way from green field to the consumer. This means
that each element of the supplier-offering has to be
examined in terms of its impact on the financial
performance of each element of the retailer’s portion of
the supply chain, and sold actively on a fair-share
basis, on a multi-level and multi-functional basis to
both parties.
Anything less
will be all ‘doom and gloom’, the final certainty….
Date article published: December 2008
For KamTips on
'Making
ROCE Work, in Uncertain Times'
see
Namnews
–
December 2008
