Standing up to
the Reality of Retail…
By
Brian Moore, Global retail consultant and CEO
of
EMR-NAMNEWS
Email this Article to a Friend
Survival for suppliers in the
current retail climate means being able to understand the realities of the
retail business model and insisting upon a fair share of the risk-reward
investment as equal business partners…
Essentially, good
retailers work in the ultimate reality of open-market buying and selling. They
operate in a ‘live-money’ environment, where they are paid in cash, and need to
measure the financial impact of each element of the retail offering in terms of
cost and value. They also attempt to pass all business risk back up the supplier
pipeline.
Moreover, as they
attempt to optimise shopper-visits and ensure return-visits, retailers are
constantly looking for proof-of-value by their customer-base in real time. They need to
be able to make and measure micro-adjustments to the retail offering, knowing
that they are dealing with shoppers who vote with their feet if their needs are
not being met…and all increasingly under the eyes of the Government and media…
In contrast,
branded manufacturers are compelled to extrapolate ‘universal’ insights from
sample-consumers, know less about their user-base and in the main have to
operate through third party retail intermediaries. A supplier can therefore
benefit significantly from the synergies resulting from combining shopper &
consumer insights. However, understanding the retail financial model can convey
real insights:
A retailer’s low
net margin means that because of knife-edge financing, a 1% increase in sales
transfers to the bottom line as a profit gain of 40% for a retailer with a 2.5%
net margin. By the same token, a 1% cut in cost price, given a 75% average cost
of goods, produces a 30% increase in net profit, for the same retailer.
Bearing in mind
that a supplier provides up to 80% of a retailer’s working capital, free of
charge, it could be said that good retailers need good suppliers….
This immediacy of
retail not only makes for exciting business partnerships, but can also help a
supplier to incorporate ‘real world’ elements into the supplier business model,
identify mutual needs and provide a basis for a more equal relationship with
retail customers.
However, facing up
to the reality of retail means acknowledging that retailers view brands as
‘guarantees’ of financial performance, in terms of building consumer demand,
allowing appropriate retail prices at even a 1% premium, generous margins, free
credit and conduits for trade funding.
In addition, the
brand attracts ‘its’ consumer to the store, to be confronted in the aisle by a
private-label that can represent equal or better value for the ‘uncommitted’
shopper, thus generating incremental business for the retailer. Finally,
zero-defect deliveries allow a retailer to operate on minimum levels of stock,
and offer 100% availability.
Given this degree
of mutual need it is imperative that all suppliers identify and measure their
impact upon the retailer’s financial performance and insist upon deals that
provide a fair share of risk and reward as a price for maintaining the business
partnership.
This means reducing
all aspects of the buyer-seller relationship to measures of cost and value, and
insisting upon their acknowledgement within the partnership, or else….
KAMTips:Identifying
and using the supplier’s contribution to the retailer’s business performance
Essentially,
a retailer’s business performance is judged by its ability to generate an
acceptable Return on Capital Employed, given level of perceived risk and
peer-group performance.
In order to become equal trade
partners, suppliers need to be able to identify and demonstrate their impact
upon the retailer’s ability to deliver proof-of-value to the shopper, at all
levels within both organisations. This ability is based upon a practical insight
into how the supplier and retailer business models interact.
An ‘acceptable’ ROCE (say 15%) not
only drives share-price performance, but also determines the rate of bank
interest on the retailer’s borrowings, the supplier’s willingness to invest
trade funds, develop invest-partnerships and provide working capital via free
credit.
Incidentally, suppliers who still
believe that their buyers are driven only by Gross Margin and Sales Performance
need to consider that as their remuneration package now includes a high
proportion of share options, buyers are increasingly motivated by the ROCE
impact upon share price.
This means that suppliers can
influence the retailer by understanding and being able to demonstrate their
direct impact upon the retailer’s ROCE. As most suppliers know, Return on
Capital Employed = Return on Sales x Sales/Capital Employed (details available
free to Namnews subscribers on:
www.kamcity.com/kamtips/NAMstats/stats12se.asp). This is essentially about
the supplier’s ability to drive retail sales, reduce retail costs and enhance
retail margin.
Return on Sales:
It follows that the provision of strong brands, good quality own-label and
practical category management can help the retailer to enhance shelf prices and
overall sales performance. Effective negotiation between equal partners can then
determine jointly profitable prices, terms and provide a basis for willing
compliance. Good forecasting based upon shared shelf-data and shopper-insights
can optimise factory productivity and supply chain efficiency, thereby enhancing
supplier margin, in turn enabling adequate investment in the retail partner.
Sales/Capital Employed:
a supplier drives a retailer’s capital rotation by enhancing sales performance
via attracting appropriate customers to the store, improved shopping-basket
performance and increasing yield from shelf space.
The supplier can also affect capital
rotation by reducing the retailer’s levels of Capital Employed, i.e. improving
Fixed Assets and Current Assets usage, and optimising Current Liabilities. This
means enhancing fixed asset productivity via effective space-management and
fair-share within the category.
The supplier affects the retailer’s
Current Asset levels via zero-defect delivery at high frequency, enabling 100%
availability on shelf at minimum levels of stock. The retailer’s Current
Liabilities are optimised by the supplier’s willingness to provide free credit
for up to 30 days combined with daily delivery.
It is obvious that a good supplier can
materially enhance the retail-partner’s business performance, but it is crucial
that KAMs articulate this impact financially, not only with the buyer and other
functional contacts but also with members of the customer team within the
supplier business. Each element of the supplier offering needs to be ‘costed &
valued’ into the supplier-retailer equation in order to gain and maintain
respect as equal business partners in what is currently a very unequal
relationship in terms of investment and reward.
Only in this way can a supplier
demonstrate proof-of-value where it really matters…
Date
article published: 01/06/2006