Tesco, the Only Show in Town?
How to cope when a major customer dominates the
market
By
Brian Moore, Global retail consultant and CEO
of
EMR-NAMNEWS, mailbox@namnews.com
Email this Article to a Friend
With the
announcement of its latest figures and track record vs. its rivals, it could be
said that Tesco is on the way to becoming a solo act in UK retail. Also, given
that the world’s two most ambitious retailers Tesco and Wal-Mart are currently
competing head-to-head in the UK, as a prequel to what could eventually become a
global ‘battle of the giants’, there could also be insights in the analysis for
those operating outside the UK.
Whilst it is
possible to argue with the pace and degree of resultant trade concentration in
the UK, it is perhaps useful to explore this endgame-scenario as a means of
suppliers factoring appropriate action into long term trade and risk-management
strategies. Essentially, Tesco’s growing trade dominance is due in part to the
inadequacies of its competition in the UK.
Wal-Mart’s
Asda still not punching its weight
In spite of its
global scale, clear price-based offer and low cost-base, Wal-Mart’s Asda has not
yet managed to meet expectations in the UK in terms of gaining its ‘fair share’
of available market. Its ROCE and CAGR is lower than that of its parent, and its
resultant diluting effect upon Wal-Mart’s global performance will eventually
become more of a concern in Bentonville.
Other players
struggle
In the case of
Sainsbury’s, it appears that despite radical changes in management,
repositioning of the offer, and a dedicated focus upon improving supply chain
efficiency, the fact remains that improved like-for-like sales performances are
being gained at the expense of the bottom line. This means that despite
reductions in stock levels and wastage reduction, ROCE performance is currently
lower than could be obtained via a bank deposit. As a result the share price is
low, interest rates on bank borrowings are high, and key suppliers are choosing
alternative invest-partners.
Meanwhile,
Morrisons has suffered the misfortune of taking over a competitor nearly twice
its size, performing at half its rate on some key ratios, which had to mean that
the combined performance would be less than the sum of the parts. Added to this
was the problem of combining two radically different cultures, and two operating
systems that were effectively incompatible, in a City environment that expects
takeover turnarounds to yield positive results within 12 months…
Tesco not
missing a beat
Tesco meanwhile,
through a combination highly focused yet visionary management, a determination
to relentlessly seek out and meet consumer-shopper needs in all categories via
its Clubcard mechanism, supply chain efficiencies that allowed it to lower
prices cost-effectively, develop and manage a four-generation approach to
private-label in a balance with brand that optimises differentiation and margin.
And all of this at a time when radical change in global politics made their
business model both infinitely scalable and transferable to most markets and
categories around the world.
Thus, due to a
happy combination of circumstances and relative competencies, Tesco is set upon
a course that is delivering gains in market share that are now attracting the
critical attentions of the politicians and special interest groups.
If Tesco succeed
in managing the transition to ‘solus status’ in the UK, achieving a market
share of over 60%, it will be impossible for risk-averse or risk-neutral
suppliers to invest sufficiently in other retailers to ‘neutralise’ this degree
of polarisation.
Better for all
suppliers to accept the inevitable and model their businesses completely upon
the Tesco requirement, explore opportunities for joint-value-creation, and adapt
the model to the remaining customers… This means that all surviving retailers
will adopt Tesco KPIs or perish. Moreover, it will be in Tesco’s interest to
ensure the survival of the remaining players by setting out, applying and
conforming with industry standards at all levels in the spirit and letter of the
law.
Any deviation
will result in government action to reduce the impact of what will have become
excessive polarisation…..
Treating Tesco As Your Only Customer…
If Tesco truly possesses the capability to so dominate UK
retail that all other retailers are reduced to playing bit-parts, it is perhaps
useful to explore how they should be managed in order to optimise
joint-value-creation, in spite of the power balance.
Essentially, one has to assume that by focusing exclusively
upon identifying and meeting consumer-shopper need, Tesco is in fact meeting the
needs of our consumer, thereby meeting the needs of our business.
Finding the brand’s consumer in Tesco traffic
Having identified our consumer-profile in Tesco’s traffic
flow it is essential to take a category view of the choices available to that
consumer-shopper. This means objectively positioning our brand relative to its
natural competition, both branded and private label, from the perspective of the
consumer (see EMR Buying Mix Analysis at
www.kamcity.com/namcalc and attempting to ensure that Tesco allocates fair
share in terms of space and support. Any lack of objectivity on our part would
result in Tesco imposing the view of the consumer-shopper with such damaging
consequences that the system would be self-policing.
Having achieved this degree of objectivity in meeting
consumer need, it is then necessary to ensure that the supplier organisation be
fully integrated with Tesco as an invest trade partner (see
www.kamcity.com/library/articles/partner.htm for criteria).
Given that in this scenario Tesco will effectively be the
only customer, alignment and compatibility are crucial. By the same token Tesco
will have a vested interest in selecting the correct invest-supplier, in order
to optimise the relationship. Incidentally, as far as risk is concerned, it is
taken for granted that only risk-seeking suppliers need apply for this level of
trade partnership. Risk neutral and risk averse suppliers will by definition be
reduced to transactional relationships, in this scenario.
With consumer need and trade partnership on the right
footing, both parties are in a position to explore opportunities for joint-value
creation. This means examining Tesco’s value creation processes, and achieving a
thorough understanding of the goals and concerns of its organisation.
Joint value creation
Specifically, it means assessing its value creation process
in terms of strategic management, business development, analysis & choice,
purchasing, selling, core business activities, and follow-up to ensure
that both parties adapt their processes to the partner in
order to create value for both. In practice this means integrating consumer
marketing, marketing to trade and retailer marketing, within the customer’s
decision-making-process. Measures will include combined supplier KPIs and
customer’s KPIs in one system. The process will be optimised via effective
networking, and genuine joint business planning, to cut costs, drive sales and
optimise trade funding…
Again, given the extreme polarisation represented by the
scenario, half measures will not be tolerated. Also because of the political
vulnerability of a dominant Tesco, the partner-supplier will in effect become
the conscience of the customer in the interest of self preservation…
Given the above, and on reflection, perhaps a customer with a
30% share of market is worth a little dedication…
Date
article published: 01/05/2006