Making Trade
Funding Work Harder –
a Marketing Consultant looks at Business Account Management
By
Richard Nall - Managing Consultant, Hawden Leigh
The other day I
attended a 2-day
Business Account Management workshop in order to ‘broaden my skills profile’
- or some other such jargon beloved of self-help books – and came away having
both learned and been reminded of much.
The key
“learning” was the confirmation in my mind that which I always knew but had
never fully crystallised. The role, skills and capabilities required of a
modern Business Account Manager (business management, consumer/shopper insight
understanding, and product & customer life cycle management) are, with some
nuances, identical to that of a Marketer (business management, consumer/shopper
insight development, portfolio/product life cycle and agency management). I
emphasise the word “management” as high quality sales & marketing personnel
recognise that their role is one of a conductor - to integrate, lead and
motivate a team of diverse internal and external functional experts to deliver a
profit driving benefit to the organisation.
Optimising
output from trade partnership
When put like
this, it seems obvious and yet few of my sales colleagues over the years seemed
to realise the true worth of effective planning in developing profitable trade
partnerships. Consider for a moment that in excess of 50% of the retail sales
value can end up with your customer in fixed (trade margin) or variable (overrider,
settlement discount, space, promotional space, displays etc) cost. Think then
about your own operating profit margin - between 5% and 10% for many of you.
That doesn’t leave much margin for error between profit and loss.
Therefore,
creative (or irresponsible) use of these monies can literally determine success
(or failure) of a brand. We would all rightly criticise marketing colleagues if
they delivered a brand plan lacking in consumer, competitor and customer
insight. Yet those who have the greatest opportunity to make or destroy a
brand’s/product’s economic value quite often have big gaps in their knowledge
that prevent successful implementation with a customer. These can be as varied
as the functional benefits of the brand/product, its role in the company’s or
customer’s portfolio, who their key contacts should be outside of the buyer,
when range decision/change dates are, what key financial measures their customer
or their own business use or what negotiation/in-store levers they can pull to
deliver sales growth.
Measuring
trade funds
Take for a
moment your trade terms. You probably haven’t had a price increase for 3 years
and are consequently deeply concerned about the never-ending increases in
investment you feel you have to make. Most of you will envy the economies of
scale enjoyed by the leading brands in your segment that seem to enable them to
promote at will. Some facts you can’t change: the brand leader is likely to
enjoy the lowest trade margins and they will have economies of scale in (amongst
others) purchasing, selling, networking and promotion spend. Your funds have to
work so much harder for you yet, hand on heart, you probably don’t know which
are adding the most value to your business.
So you need to
think differently. You probably have a customer P&L down to at least
contribution level. All of you will think of the starting point in terms of net
sales value (NSV); many will think of it in terms of invoiced sales value (ISV)
but few if any will think of it in terms of retail sales value (RSV). This
isn’t surprising because your Finance colleagues tend to control the means of
internal reporting, yet starting at RSV gives you a huge benefit. You have
total transparency of how much you are ‘investing’ in your customer. More
importantly you can determine how much harder your ‘investment’ is actually
working for you. Does the customer really deserve that 25%/35%/45% margin? Are
you really enforcing the over-rider terms; indeed have they got out of control -
3%, 4% or even 6% or 7%? What is the return on promotional investment? What is
the true worth of that settlement discount? What is the value of that price
roll-back ‘investment’?
More creative
use of trade funds
Buyers will
naturally keep asking for more and, at the same time, can be made to realise
that they could well be destroying a supplier’s long term competitive
situation. So you need to resist by diverting the buyer into more creative use
of the monies available. You will be surprised how many will work with you to
do so if approached properly. Our manufacturing colleagues spend hours trying
to turn fixed in to variable or unnecessary costs in order to drive down cost of
production and increase factory productivity. Why should we treat retailer
investment in any other way? It has to become more productive if we are to
sustain strong businesses long term. This is not a choice; it is a necessity.
So when you are
considering your customer P&L, think about it differently. Start out at RSV,
quantify how much ‘investment’ you are making and then think about how it could
be cut differently to add real value to you and your customer. If your customer
is making 35% margin, could it be cut to 30% with the 5% re-invested in
incentives? …for the breadth of your current range? …for your latest new
product? …for maximising the visibility of your brand on shelf? …for early
payment? If you think this is impossible, then think again as your competitor is
probably working on it right now.
In other words,
you need to plan your customer business, with a rigour expected of other
functions, in order to ensure the long term success of your organisation.
Presuming your execution is already strong, these planning skills are what will
set you and your organisation apart. These are the skills that will help you
deliver an outstanding performance and drive your career. They are skills that
are 100% transferable (why should negotiating with a marketing agency or an
ingredients supplier or a union representative be much different from
negotiating with a retailer…?) making you a highly prized individual when your
organisation is undertaking its annual talent review.
By Richard Nall - Managing Consultant, Hawden Leigh -
rganall@yahoo.co.uk
Date article published: November 2005